[ad_1]
Virginia lawmakers on Wednesday defeated for one more yr marketing campaign finance reform laws that might have prohibited elected officers from spending political donations on private bills equivalent to mortgages, holidays or fitness center memberships.
Virginia — which permits limitless donations from people, companies and particular curiosity teams — is a nationwide outlier for missing such a ban, and advocates on the Common Meeting have been attempting for greater than a decade to place private use restrictions on candidates’ spending.
Their hopes {that a} invoice would attain GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s desk this yr ended with Wednesday’s unrecorded voice vote in a Home Appropriations Committee, as that measure was the final private use ban nonetheless alive. One other model died within the Home of Delegates earlier this session for lack of a listening to.
VIRGINIA ELECTION OFFICIAL URGES VOTERS NOT TO MAIL IN ABSENTEE BALLOTS AMID DELIVERY CONCERNS
Democratic Del. Luke Torian, who chairs the Appropriations Committee, mentioned that each he and Democratic Home Speaker Don Scott want to see the invoice go subsequent yr. He did not clarify his reasoning for a delay.
“So that is going to be one of many priorities that shall be earlier than us through the 2025 session,” he mentioned.
Democratic Del. Mark Sickles mentioned he “reluctantly” motioned to hold the invoice over to subsequent yr.
The Virginia Capitol is seen on March 4, 2010, in Richmond, Va. Virginia lawmakers have been unable to go marketing campaign finance reform laws that might have prohibited elected officers from spending political donations on private bills, a problem that has been mentioned for greater than a decade. (AP Picture/Steve Helber, File)
Lawmakers have routinely characterised the problem as one thing they need to sort out whereas deferring motion on it. Youngkin has not weighed in publicly on the problem, together with his workplace saying solely that he would evaluate any laws that reached his desk.
The defeated invoice, sponsored by Democratic Sen. Jennifer Boysko, would bar candidates from changing marketing campaign contributions “to private use,” outlined as spending on a “dedication, obligation, or expense” that might “exist regardless of the particular person’s looking for, holding, or sustaining public workplace.”
Presently lawmakers are solely barred from changing marketing campaign funds to private use as soon as they shut out their accounts. A 2016 Related Press evaluate of the state’s marketing campaign finance system discovered some lawmakers regularly utilizing marketing campaign accounts to pay for dear meals and resorts in addition to private bills.
The invoice features a listing of prohibited bills equivalent to mortgages, hire, clothes, non-campaign automobiles, nation membership memberships or holidays. Allowable bills embody little one care prices incurred as a direct results of operating for or holding public workplace.
Beneath the measure, the State Board of Elections would examine complaints and in some circumstances have the choice to evaluate a civil penalty.
In a earlier listening to, Republican Del. Paul Milde, a newly elected Home member, mentioned it was “past” him why the invoice was in bother.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“The one rationale I may see for a few of us resisting this after 10 years is as a result of they … need to have the flexibleness to purchase issues that actually aren’t campaign-related issues. And I simply can’t imagine we are able to’t get collectively on this,” he mentioned.
Boysko, whose invoice cleared the Senate by a 35 to 4 vote, was not instantly out there for remark.
The laws’s defeat comes as lawmakers have been advancing two pathways to commissioning evaluations of their compensation and whether or not it ought to be elevated.
[ad_2]
Source link
